Current:Home > ScamsTexas, other GOP-led states sue over program to give immigrant spouses of US citizens legal status -ProfitEdge
Texas, other GOP-led states sue over program to give immigrant spouses of US citizens legal status
View
Date:2025-04-27 21:28:30
Sixteen Republican-led states are suing to end a federal program that could potentially give nearly half a million immigrants without legal status who are married to U.S. citizens a path to citizenship.
The coalition filed suit Friday to halt the program launched by President Joe Biden in June, saying in court filings that the Biden administration bypassed Congress to create a pathway to citizenship for “blatant political purposes.”
“This action incentivizes illegal immigration and will irreparably harm the Plaintiff states,” the suit says.
Under the policy, which started taking applications Monday, many spouses without legal status can apply for something called “parole in place,” offering permission to stay in the U.S., apply for a green card and eventually get on a path to citizenship.
But the program has been particularly contentious in an election year where immigration is one of the biggest issues, with many Republicans attacking the policy and contending it is essentially a form of amnesty for people who broke the law.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said in a statement Friday that the plan “violates the Constitution and actively worsens the illegal immigration disaster that is hurting Texas and our country.”
The suit filed against the Department of Homeland Security, DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas and other Biden administration officials accuses the agency of attempting to parole spouses “en masse,” which the states contend is an abuse of power.
The Department of Homeland Security and the White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment from The Associated Press.
The bipartisan immigration and criminal justice organization FWD.us noted the timing of the lawsuit — as Kamala Harris accepted the Democratic nomination for president — and said the program is in compliance with the law.
“The only motivation behind this lawsuit is the cruelty of tearing families apart and the crass politics of hoping a judge might do the bidding of the anti-immigrant movement,” the organization said in a statement.
To be eligible for the program, immigrants must have lived continuously in the U.S. for at least 10 years, not pose a security threat or have a disqualifying criminal history, and have been married to a citizen by June 17 — the day before the program was announced.
They must pay a $580 fee to apply and fill out a lengthy application, including an explanation of why they deserve humanitarian parole and a long list of supporting documents proving how long they have been in the country.
They apply to the Department of Homeland Security, and if approved, have three years to seek permanent residency. During that period, they can get work authorization. The administration estimates about 500,000 people could be eligible, plus about 50,000 of their children.
Before this program, it was complicated for people who were in the U.S. illegally to get a green card after marrying an American citizen. They can be required to return to their home country — often for years — and they always face the risk they may not be allowed back in.
veryGood! (715)
Related
- From family road trips to travel woes: Americans are navigating skyrocketing holiday costs
- And the First Celebrity Voted Off House of Villains Was...
- Abortions in the U.S. rose slightly after states began imposing bans and restrictions post-Roe, study finds
- Israel-Hamas war upends years of conventional wisdom. Leaders give few details on what comes next
- B.A. Parker is learning the banjo
- 5 Things podcast: Anti-science rhetoric heavily funded, well-organized. Can it be stopped?
- Lionel Messi is a finalist for the MLS Newcomer of the Year award
- Federal judge rules Georgia's district lines violated Voting Rights Act and must be redrawn
- Trump suggestion that Egypt, Jordan absorb Palestinians from Gaza draws rejections, confusion
- Man who allegedly killed Maryland judge found dead
Ranking
- Behind on your annual reading goal? Books under 200 pages to read before 2024 ends
- FDA warns about risks of giving probiotics to preterm babies after infant's death
- Israel strikes outskirts of Gaza City during second ground raid in as many days
- I need my 401(K) money now: More Americans are raiding retirement funds for emergencies
- Intellectuals vs. The Internet
- Volunteer youth bowling coach and ‘hero’ bar manager among Maine shooting victims
- Captured albino python not the 'cat-eating monster' Oklahoma City community thought
- As the Turkish Republic turns 100, here’s a look at its achievements and challenges ahead
Recommendation
Where will Elmo go? HBO moves away from 'Sesame Street'
Wife of ex-Alaska Airlines pilot says she’s in shock after averted Horizon Air disaster
New labor rule could be a big deal for millions of franchise and contract workers. Here's why.
Stock market today: Asian shares rebound following latest tumble on Wall Street. Oil prices gain $1
Romantasy reigns on spicy BookTok: Recommendations from the internet’s favorite genre
Huawei reports its revenue inched higher in January-September despite US sanctions
Billboard Music Awards 2023 Finalists: See the Complete List
In closing days of Mississippi governor’s race, candidates clash over how to fund health care